The journal (print)
is indexed in:

Russian Science Citation Index

Ulrich’s Periodicals Directory

CrossRef

ÑiteFactor

Íàó÷íàÿ ýëåêòðîííàÿ áèáëèîòåêà «Êèáåðëåíèíêà»

The online version
is indexed in:

Russian Science Citation Index

Orphus system
Main page / "Knowledge. Understanding. Skill" Journal / Contents / 2014 / No. 3

Lamazhaa Ch. K., Abdulayeva M. Sh. Archaization and Neotraditionalism: Regional Forms in Russia

The article was prepared within the framework of the project “Russian Models of Archaization and Neotraditionalism under Conditions of Modernization: A Research Database” (supported by Russian Foundation for the Humanities, grant No. 13-03-12005â).


(Moscow University for the Humanities),
(Dagestan State Pedagogical University)

Abstract ♦ In the 1990s, archaic sociocultural programs actualized in various regions of Russia through accepting a variety of forms. These variations were determined by sociocultural traditions of the local ethnicities. To provide a more relevant analysis of these processes, a team of researchers have set up a collaborative scholarly database titled “Russian models of archaization and neotraditionalism” (www.neoregion.ru).

We define archaization as a mass, unconscious and spontaneous turn towards the archaic cultural meanings and social practices, a process which arises in a number of societies during the crisis of modernizing development. Archaization is closely intertwined with neotraditionalism as a conscious attempt at reviving the traditions of ethnic culture, including the archaic ones, in order to resolve the issues of the society’s sociocultural development. In this article, we generalize the forms both processes take in Siberia and the Northern Caucasus.

Such forms of neotraditionalism as the religious, festivous and ceremonial, cultural-economic, ideological, folklore and musical ones are typical for Siberia, whereas the Northern Caucasus can be best characterized by the rise of religious, socioethical, ideological and sociopolitical forms of neotraditionalism. The archaization trends and forms of neotraditionalism we have pointed out are quite conventional, interconnected and overlapping.

The processes we have observed in Siberia and the Northern Caucasus have a lot in common. Above all, these are the processes of religious neotraditionalism closely connected to its social form. The differences lie in the varying rigidness of social links and relations, which is largely due to religious attitudes and to the general distinctions between traditional sociocultural lives peoples of both regions have historically achieved prior to the 20th century.

Keywords: archaization, neotraditionalism, Siberia, North Caucasus, forms of neotraditionalism, religious revival, clan system, neoshamanism, Islamization.


Lamazhaa Chimiza Kuder-oolovna, Doctor of Philosophy, Vice-director, Institute of Fundamental and Applied Studies, Moscow University for the Humanities, full member of the International Academy of Science (Innsbruck, Austria). Postal address: 5 Yunosti St., Moscow, Russian Federation, 111395. Tel.: +7 (499) 374-75-95. E-mail: lamajaa@mail.ru

Abdulayeva Medina Shamilyevna, Doctor of Culturology, Associate Professor, Chair, Department of Music Studies, Choral Conducting and Methodology of Music Education, Dagestan State Pedagogical University. Postal address: 57 Yaragsky St., Makhachkala, Dagestan, Russia Federation, 367003. Tel.: + 7 (8722) 62-57-95. E-mail: m-medina71@yandex.ru

Download

Citation: Lamazhaa, Ch. K. and Abdulayeva, M. Sh. (2014) Arkhaizatsiia i neotraditsionalizm: rossiiskie regional'nye formy [Archaization and Neotraditionalism: Regional Forms in Russia]. Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie, no. 3, pp. 68–80. (In Russ.).

Submission date: 20.05.2014.

RUSSIAN VERSION


REFERENCES

Abakarova, R. M. (2003) Etos etnosa. Nravstvenno-reguliativnaia rol' traditsii v etnokul'ture [The Ethos of Ethnicity: The Moral and Regulatory Role of Tradition in Ethnic Culture]. St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg Philosophical Society. 186 p. (In Russ.).

Avksentiev, V. A. (2012) Ekonomicheskie i sotsiokul'turnye determinanty regional'nykh konfliktov na Iuge Rossii [Economic and Sociocultural Determiners of Regional Conflicts in the South of Russia]. In: Dialog kul'tur v usloviiakh globalizatsii: XII Mezhdunarodnye Likhachevskie nauchnye chteniia, 17–18 maia 2012 g. [Dialogue of Cultures under Globalization: 12th International Likhachev Academic Readings]. St. Petersburg, Saint-Petersburg University of Humanities and Social Sciences Press. Vol. 1. Doklady [Papers Presented]. Pp. 370–372. (In Russ.).

Albogachieva, M. S. (2011) Poligamiia v sovremennoi Ingushetii [Polygamy in Contemporary Ingushetia]. In: IX Kongress etnografov i antropologov Rossii [The 9th Congress of Russia’s Ethnographists and Anthropologists]. Petrozavodsk, The Karelian Research Center of the RAS Press. 565 p. Pp. 444–445. (In Russ.).

Arifmezova, G. (2014) Mesto dagestanskoi zhenshchiny [The Role of the Woman in Dagestan]. Kavkazskaia politika [online] Available at: http://kavpolit.com/articles/mesto_dagestanskoj_zhenschiny-6226/ [archived in WebCite] (accessed 22.05.2014). (In Russ.).

Akhiezer, A. S. (1997) Rossiia: kritika istoricheskogo opyta (Sotsiokul'turnaia dinamika Rossii) [Russia: A Critique of Historical Experience (Sociocultural Dynamics in Russia)] : in 2 vols. Novosibirsk, Sibirskii khronograf Publ. Vol. 1. Ot proshlogo k budushchemu [From the Past to the Future]. 804 p.

Bobrovnikov, V. O. (2000) Abreki i gosudarstvo. Kul'tura nasiliia na Kavkaze [Abreks and the State. The Culture of Violence in the Caucasus]. Vestnik Evrazii, no. 1 (8), pp. 19–46. (In Russ.).

Bobrovnikov, V. O. (2005) Politizatsiia shariata na postsovetskom Severnom Kavkaze: proekty i mify [Politicizing the Sharia in the Post-Soviet Northern Caucasus: Projects and Myths]. In: Rossiia i sovremennyi mir: Problemy sovremennogo razvitiia [Russia and the Contemporary World: Development Issues] : Proceedings of the 1st International conference. Moscow, April 14–15, 2005] / ed. by D. V. Vasilieva. Moscow, The Institute of Business and Politics Press. Pp. 213–220. (In Russ.).

Bulatov, A. O. (2011) Problemy sovremennykh mezhnatsional'nykh otnoshenii v Rossii (s uchetom faktora vnutrennikh migratsii): mify i real'nost' [The Problems of Contemporary Interethnic Relations in Russia (With Regard to Internal Migration)]. Gosudarstvo, religiia, tserkov' v Rossii i za rubezhom, no. 3–4, pp. 435–445. (In Russ.).

Gereev, R. (2013) Etnicheskie klany Dagestana v svete prikhoda k vlasti «komandy» Abdulatipova [Dagestan’s Ethnic Clans and the Rise to Power of the Abdulatipov “Team”]. Federal'naia lezginskaia natsional'no-kul'turnaia avtonomiia [online] Available at: http://flnka.ru/politika/1239-etnicheskie-klany-dagestana-v-svete-prihoda-k-vlasti-komandy-abdulatipova.html [archived in WebCite] (accessed 20.05.2014). (In Russ.).

Gozgesheva, S. M. (2011) Fenomen traditsionnykh institutov obychnogo prava (adata) i musul'manskogo (shariata) na Severnom Kavkaze [The Phenomena of the Legal Institutes of Adats (Common Law) and the Sharia (Moslem Law) in the Northern Caucasus]. Vestnik Adygeiskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriia 1: Regionovedenie: filosofiia, istoriia, sotsiologiia, iurisprudentsiia, politologiia, kul'turologiia, no. 3, pp. 293–300. (In Russ.).

Zhiteli dagestanskogo sela Gubden ne puskaiut detei v shkolu po religioznym soobrazheniiam (2009) [People of the Gubden Village in Dagestan Keep Their Children Off School Out of Religious Considerations]. RIA Novosti — Iug [online] Available at: http://ug.ria.ru/incidents/20090401/81800767.html [archived in WebCite] (accessed 22.05.2014). (In Russ.).

Lamazhaa, Ch. K. (2009) Problema arkhaizatsii obshchestva [The Problem of the Archaization of Society]. Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie, no. 4, pp. 44–48. (In Russ.).

Lamazhaa, Ch. K. (2010) Arkhaizatsiia, traditsionalizm i neotraditsionalizm [Archaization, Traditionalism and Neotraditionalism]. Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie, no. 2, pp. 88–93. (In Russ.).

Lamazhaa, Ch. K. (2011) Arkhaizatsiia obshchestva v period sotsial'nykh transformatsii [The Archaization of Society in the Period of Social Transformations]. Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie, no. 3, pp. 35–42. (In Russ.).

Lamazhaa, Ch. K. (2013) Arkhaizatsiia obshchestva. Tuvinskii fenomen [Society Archaization. The Tuvan Phenomenon]. Moscow, Librokom Publishing House. 272 p. (In Russ.).

Lapshin, V. A. (2014) Neotraditsionalizm v Tsentral'noi Rossii: formy, dvizheniia, ideologiia [Neo-Traditionalism in Central Russia: The Forms, Movements, Ideology]. Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie, no. 2, pp. 102–108. (In Russ.).

Magomedsalikhov, Kh. G. (2008) Maslaat — samobytnaia forma razresheniia konfliktov [The Maslaat as an Indigenous Form of Conflict Resolution]. Voprosy istorii, no. 6, pp. 137–142. (In Russ.).

Madiukova, S. A. and Popkov, Yu. V. (2011) Fenomen sotsiokul'turnogo neotraditsionalizma [The Phenomenon of Sociocultural Neotraditionalism] / ed. by E. A. Tiugashev. St. Petersburg, Aleteiia Publ. 132 p. (In Russ.).

Nikolaeva, E. V. (2004) Neotraditsionalizm v kul'ture povsednevnosti (Rossiiskaia versiia kontsa XX veka) [Neotraditionalism in the Everyday Culture (The Russian Version in Late 20th Century] : diss. … Candidate of Culturology. Moscow. 170 p. (In Russ.).

Suzukei, V. Iu. (2007) Muzykal'naia kul'tura Tuvy v XX stoletii [The Musical Culture of Tuva in the 20th Century]. Moscow, Kompozitor Publ. 408 p. (In Russ.).

Sushchii, S. Ya. (2013) Severnyi Kavkaz: Realii, problemy, perspektivy pervoi treti XXI veka [Northern Caucasus: Realities, Issues and Prospects in the Early 21st Century]. Moscow, Lenand Publ. 432 p. (In Russ.).

Tkhagapsoev, Kh. G. (2007) Kavkazskaia identichnost' v protsessakh rossiiskoi sotsiokul'turnoi transformatsii: k metodologii analiza i mekhanizmam regulirovaniia [The Caucasian Identity in the Course of Russian Sociocultural Transformation: On the Methodology of Analysis and the Regulation Mechanisms]. In: Etnokratii na Iuge Rossii v ekspertnom izmerenii [Ethnocracy in the South of Russia in Expert Investigations]. Rostov-on-Don, The North Caucasus Research Center of Higher School at South Federal University Press. Pp. 36–67. (In Russ.).

Friedman, T. (2003) Lexus i oliva. Ponimaia globalizatsiiu [The Lexus and the Olive Tree: Understanding Globalization] : transl. from English. St. Petersburg, Ves' Publ. 519 p. (In Russ.).

Khunagov, R. D. and Shadzhe, A. Yu. (2001) Kavkazskii faktor v sovremennoi Rossii [The Factor of the Caucasus in Contemporary Russia]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia, no. 3, pp. 77–80. (In Russ.).

Chabieva, T. S. (2011) Nekotorye osobennosti sootnosheniia poniatii «teip» i «vird» v ingushskom obshchestve [Some Correlations between the Notions of “teip” and “vird” in the Ingush Society]. Vestnik KGU im. N. A. Nekrasova, vol. 17, no. 5–6, pp. 200–205. (In Russ.).

Yakh’iaev, M. Ya. (2012) Obshchee i osobennoe v etnicheskoi kul'ture dagestantsev [The General and the Particular in the Ethnic Culture of the Dagestanis]. Politicheskoe obrazovanie [online] Available at: http://www.lawinrussia.ru/node/166960 [archived in WebCite] (accessed 20.05.2014). (In Russ.).



to top


Moscow University for the Humanities


"Knowledge. Understanding. Skill" No. 4 2021
 The No. 4 2021 of the
Journal "Knowledge.
Understanding. Skill"
 is issued


What kind of higher education will be at the end of the XXI century?
 global and unified for the whole world
 local with the revival of traditions of national educational models
 something else
 there will be no necessity for it in general
© The Editorial Board of the Informational Portal for the Humanities
"Knowledge. Understanding. Skill"

The Portal is registered by the Federal Service of Supervision over Observance of Legislation
in Mass Media Sphere and Protection of the Cultural Inheritance.
Registration certificate Ýë ÔÑ77-25026 of the 14th of July, 2006.

ßíäåêñ öèòèðîâàíèÿ  Rambler's Top100

Developed by: "Internet Factory"