Abstract ♦ The article analyzes some features of political modernization in the post-socialist space. Political modernization as a process assumes the creation of an efficient set of restrictions of political power, and of a set of control tools working in the interest of both private individuals and the society in general. Thus, the process implies a “quality leap” in public services and more efficient authorities and institutes of civil society.
Our focus on the dynamics and efficiency of political modernization is contextualized within the global political process (from the collapse of bipolar system at the end of the 20th century to the 2013–2014 crisis in Ukraine). In all post-socialist countries, political modernization occurred during the liberalization of the political sphere when the multi-party system was being set up. Political modernization is noted to be stable only if the political system in general has achieved stability and a beneficiary political class has appeared. The success of political modernization depends on political culture and on a wide range of institutes of civil society (political parties, labor unions, etc.).
The cases of a number of states (Poland, Hungary, the Czech Republic) reveal a number of the measures aimed at enhancing the public services. It allowed these states to quickly solve urgent social and economic problems caused by both internal and external factors.
We conclude that political modernization in the post-socialist space has distinctive features of its own due to specific national traditions and a certain level of political culture. Thus, a mechanical transfer of the Western democratic institutes onto post-communist reality does not enhance their legitimacy and significantly limits their efficiency.
Keywords: political process, political modernization, post-socialist space, state, civil society, political interests, political power, political parties.
Zlatanov Blagoi Georgiev, Candidate of Philosophy, Associate Professor, Department of Philosophy, Culturology and Politology, Moscow University for the Humanities. Postal address: 5 Yunosti St., Moscow, Russian Federation, 111395. Tel.: +7 (499) 374-55-11. E-mail:
zlatanol@bk.ru
Citation: Zlatanov, B. G. (2015) Osobennosti modernizatsii na postsotsialisticheskom prostranstve [Features of modernization on post-socialist space]. Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie, no. 1, pp. 70–77. DOI: 10.17805/zpu.2015.1.6 (In Russ.).
Brusilovska, O. I. (2005) Pol³tichna transformats³ia Ugorshchini ta Chekh³¿ v drug³i polovin³ 90-kh rr. XX — na pochatku XXI st.: por³vnial'nii anal³z [Political transformation of Hungary and the Czech Republic in the second half of the 1990s and early 21st century: a comparative analysis]. Visnik Odes'kogo natsional'nogo universitetu, vol. 10, issue 11. Series: Sots³olog³ia ³ pol³tichn³ nauki. Pp. 147–155. (In Ukr.).
Burenko, V. I. (2012) Gruppy interesov i lobbizm v politicheskom protsesse (zarubezhnyi opyt i rossiiskaia praktika) [Interest groups and lobbyism in political process (foreign and Russian practices)]. Vestnik Universiteta (Gosudarstvennyi universitet upravleniia), no. 4, pp. 5–10. (In Russ.).
Gaman-Golutvina, O. V., Timofeeva, L. N. and Smorgunov, L. V. (2014) Politika modernizatsii neeffektivna bez sotrudnichestva gosudarstva s biznesom i obshchestvom [The policy of modernization is inefficient without cooperation of the state with business and society]. Vlast', no. 1, pp. 185–187. (In Russ.).
Grishin, O. E. and Sokolova, A. E. (2013) Formirovanie reputatsionnogo kapitala gosudarstva: innovatsionnye informatsionno-kommunikatsionnye tekhnologii [Building the reputation capital of the state: innovative information and communication technologies]. PolitBook, no. 2, pp. 106–116. (In Russ.).
Kryuchkov, V. A., Skovikov, A. K. and Shumilova, O. V. (2014) Zarubezhnyi opyt politicheskogo razvitiia obshchestva (po materialam arkhivnykh dokumentov) [Foreign experience of the society’s political development (based on archival documents)]. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniia, no. 4. [online] Available at: [archived in ] (accessed 10.11.2014). (In Russ.).
Liseenko, E. V. (2005) Politicheskaia modernizatsiia: ukrainskii vektor razvitiia [Political modernization: The Ukrainian vector of development]. In: Metodolog³ia, teor³ia ta praktika sots³olog³chnogo anal³zu suchasnogo susp³l'stva [Methodology, theory and practice of sociological studies of contemporary society] : collection of research articles. Kharkov, Karaz³n Kharkov National University Publ. 716 p. Pp. 429–434. (In Russ.).
Morozova, E. G. and Falina, A. S. (2013) Modernizatsia kak kontsept sovremennoi politologii [Modernization as a concept in modern political science]. Gosudarstvennaia sluzhba, no. 1 (81), pp. 79–83. (In Russ.).
Postkommunisticheskie transformatsii: vektory, napravleniia, so-derzhanie [Postcommunist transformations: vectors, directions, contents] (2004) / ed. by S. S. Babenko and O. D. Kutsenko. Kharkov, Karaz³n Kharkov National University Publ. 418 p. (In Russ.).
Rychard, A. and Wnuk-Lipiński, E. (2002) Istochniki politicheskoi stabil'nosti i nestabil'nosti v Pol'she [Sources of political stability and instability in Poland]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia, no. 6, pp. 62–73. (In Russ.).
Steiner, H. (2003) Razlichiia i skhodstvo v sotsial'nykh realiiakh: sotsiologicheskii analiz Rossii v sravnenii s Pol'shei i Vengriei [Differences and similarity in social realities: a sociological analysis of Russia in comparison with Poland and Hungary]. Sotsiologiia: teoriia, metody, marketing, no. 4, pp. 191–206. (In Russ.).
Shumilov, A. V. (2006) Modernizatsiia obshchestva i elektoral'nyi protsess: problemy i podkhody [Modernization of society and electoral process: problems and approaches]. Vestnik Chuvashskogo universiteta, no. 6, pp. 220–225. (In Russ.).
